{"id":33409,"date":"2023-11-26T11:52:32","date_gmt":"2023-11-26T11:52:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rsgb.org\/main\/?p=33409"},"modified":"2023-11-27T16:54:46","modified_gmt":"2023-11-27T16:54:46","slug":"wrc-23-week-1-summary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rsgb.org\/main\/blog\/front-page-news\/2023\/11\/26\/wrc-23-week-1-summary\/","title":{"rendered":"WRC-23: Week-1 Summary"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"WRC-23 finished its first week with all current agenda items underway and an early discussion on new ones for WRC27\/31. Amateur interests have been cropping up on a wide front\u00a0\u00a0 – both 23cm and other bands from HF to mmWaves.<\/strong><\/p>\n

As previously reported,<\/a><\/strong> AI-9.1b on 1240-1300MHz has seen Recommendation ITU-R M.2164 released just beforehand. A third meeting on AI-9.1b on Friday (Day-5) was again nowhere near consensus, with CEPT again keen to turn the recommendation into a globally mandated measure. The latter is of considerable concern as it would leave no flexibility at national level, rather than the \u2018guidance\u2019 from the basic recommendation itself. A broader view held by some others is that 9.1x items are just intended for ITU-Reports etc and not meant to change the Radio Regulations treaty.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Friday concluded with the first discussion on the AI-10 WRC-27 Space Weather item, with a series of amateur bands in a provisional list (28, 51, 220 MHz), though it is early days on that.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/h4>\n

Agenda Items Summary<\/strong><\/span><\/h4>\n

Overall the main ones being tracked with amateur matters are as follows:-<\/p>\n